Search Results for "taxing provision interpretation"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference in Income Tax Deduction and Revision Case. The court considered whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80I and whether the Tribunal correctly sustained the CIT's revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Vijay Udhyog, a part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Income-tax Act as Time-Barred -- Reassessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 Held Invalid Due to Limitation Under Sections 148, 149, 153A, and 153C

The High Court of Gujarat allowed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2012-13 Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Sanction Under Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Without Proper Approval from Competent Authority Are Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, an individual and citizen of India, filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 153C of Income Tax Act for Non-Supply of Satisfaction Note. Failure to Provide Satisfaction Note Recorded by the Assessing Officer Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Renders the Notice Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirma Limited, received funds from Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Limited during Financial Years 2009-10 to 2011-12 by way of share app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 153A of Income-tax Act for Being Time-Barred. Notice issued beyond six-year limitation period from end of assessment year held invalid.

The petitioner, Popular Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate business, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 on 29.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for AY 2012-13 as Time-Barred. Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limit Under Section 149 After Search Under Section 132 on 08.09.2021.

The petitioner, Manojbhai Bhupatbhai Vadodaria, filed a writ petition challenging a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case Against SEBI. Regulatory fees collected under SEBI Act, 1992 are statutory levies, not consideration for taxable service under Finance Act, 1994.

The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East, filed an appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat's Property Tax Levy on Industrial Units in KIADB Area — Property Tax Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Is Valid Despite KIADB Land Ownership.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various industrial units located in the Sompura Industrial Area, developed by the Karnataka I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Classification of Stainless Steel Water Filter as Utensil Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. Water Filter Held to Be a Utensil Covered by Schedule Entry C-II-46, Not a General Item.

The case involved two references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1958, at the instance of the Revenue. The respondent, M/s Neelam App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons to Believe Income Escaped Assessment. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Cost of Acquisition Under Section 55(2)(b)(ii) is Invalid.

The petitioner, J.B. Amin & Brothers (HUF), owned land at Aurangpura, Aurangabad, purchased by late Balubhai Amin for Rs.1,80,000. After his death in ...