Search Results for "special limitation"

3511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellants Fail to Prove Exclusive Title Over Suit Property. Court upholds trial court's finding that suit property was joint family property and not self-acquired, dismissing appeal for lack of evidence.

The appellants, five sisters, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of a property situated at Village Manor, Taluka Palghar, District Tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears and determines Notice of Motion No. 1211 of 2014 in Suit No. 777 of 2014 seeking interim injunctions and appointment of administrator. The court examines rival claims of family arrangements and fiduciary capacity over Gopal Raheja Group assets.

The dispute arose out of the affairs of the Gopal Raheja Group, a real estate business originally established by Lachmandas Raheja and continued by hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Plaint Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit.

The applicant, original defendant No.1 in S.C.S. No.5055/2012, filed a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...