Search Results for "section 47(3)"

441 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 441 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Driver's Own Negligence Not Covered Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Tribunal's finding of employment and salary set aside; penal interest direction modified.

The case arises from a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the dependents of Nazir Beg, who died in a motor acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Liability Not Fastened as Driver Had No Valid Driving Licence. Owner Failed to Verify Licence Validity, Insurance Company Not Liable but Directed to Pay and Recover Under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited challenging the judgment and award dated 30.06.2012 passed by the Additional Senior Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Superannuation Dispute. Employee Entitled to Continue Till Age 60 as Per Certified Standing Orders Under Section 28 and Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Bhandara, which allowed a complaint filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity and robbery with attempt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...