Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"

1177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1177 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Trust Office Bearers. Scheme of Administration Does Not Prohibit No-Confidence Motion; Resolution Valid Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

3 Nov 2020

The petitioners, Lakhichand Marotrao Dhoble and Kisangopal Chunnilalji Gandhi, were the Chairman and Treasurer respectively of a public trust named Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in Retrenchment Dispute, Examining Scope of Industrial Tribunal's Jurisdiction. Key Issues Include Whether Tribunal Could Determine Legality Under Section 25F When Reference Limited to Justifiability of Retrenchment.

9 Mar 2005

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute concerning the retrenchment of seven workmen by M/s DBH International Ltd., a clearing and forwarding agen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application by Vidarbha Cricket Association in Pension Dispute. Writ Petition Maintainable Against Society Performing Public Functions Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

17 Oct 2012

The judgment concerns a Miscellaneous Civil Application filed by Vidarbha Cricket Association (VCA) seeking recall/review of an order dated 09.08.2012...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions Against Lawyers' Strikes in Uttarakhand — Lawyers Have No Right to Strike or Boycott Courts. The Court held that strikes by advocates interfere with administration of justice and access to justice, and that Bar Councils must take disciplinary action against such conduct.

28 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the District Bar Association, Dehradun, challenging a High Court judgment that directed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Jul 2024

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.

6 Apr 2026

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)