Search Results for "produced"

16854 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16854 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Release on Ground of Illegal Detention in Corruption Case — No Violation of Article 22(2) or Section 57 CrPC as Arrest Was at 11:45 PM and Production Within 24 Hours Was Not Possible Due to Distance and Night Hours.

The petitioners, Anil Jaisinghani and Nirmal Rajkumar Jaisinghani, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Order Allowing Production of Additional Documents in RAE&R Suit. Court Held That Mere Production of Documents Without Ruling on Admissibility Does Not Cause Prejudice to Petitioners.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the petitioners challenging an order dated 1 August 2022 passed by the learned Judge, Small Causes Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable.

The petitioners, foreign nationals from various countries including Tanzania, Iran, Gujarat, Mumbai, Tamil Nadu, and others, were implicated in a case...