Search Results for "notice before demolition"

874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Affidavit-in-Reply to Notice of Motion Cannot Be Treated as Written Statement.

The appellant, M/s. B. Jayantilal, a partnership firm, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under MRTP Act — Petitioner Failed to Produce Valid Documents to Establish Legality of Construction.

The petitioner, Jitendra Gorakh Megh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the demolition of his bungalow ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Condominium Against Developer for Declaration of Rights Over Adjoining Plots as Barred by Limitation. Claims for Easement and Right of Way Held Time-Barred Under Articles 25, 65, and 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Plaintiffs, Beach Towers Condominium and its President, filed a suit in 2012 seeking declarations that they have a right of way and easement over ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Council to Demolish Unauthorised Construction in Neighbour Dispute — Upholds Duty of Municipal Authority Under MRTP Act Despite Pending Civil Suit. Writ Petition Maintainable as Municipal Authority's Statutory Duty is Independent of Civil Court Proceedings.

The petitioners, flat purchasers residing in Baramati, Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a directive ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple and Construction of Commercial Complex. Petitioners Failed to Establish Temple as Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

The petitioners, residents of Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the demolition of a temple dedicated to Lord Hanuman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple Structure at Vaidya Wadi. Court holds that the structure was not a protected monument and the petitioners lacked locus standi.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by four individuals claiming to be residents and devotees of a temple located at Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately

The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...