Search Results for "eye-witnesses"

947 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 947 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by independent evidence.

The case involves three appeals filed by Darshan Harbans Singh, Jamin Sharafat Khan, and Jayesh @ Bachchi Jeetnarayan Singh against their conviction u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Accused convicted under Section 302 IPC for stabbing deceased following a quarrel over earnings, with multiple eyewitnesses and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Bablu @ Mohammed Hasan Nawab Qureshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, on 20.09.1997 in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitnesses and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent Manulal Shankar Waghmare in Sessions Case No. 70 of 1997 by the 3rd Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicts in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC — Life Sentence Upheld for Fatal Assault with Stones and Stick. Common intention established by simultaneous assault and credible eyewitness testimony, corroborated by medical evidence.

The case arises from an incident on 27-5-1998 at about 7:00 p.m. opposite a pan shop of Baban @ Babasaheb Ibrahim Mulla in village Shinganapur, Taluka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacked Completeness and Chain of Events.

The appellant, Pravin Narayan Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of a person and sentenced to life i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside for Lack of Credible Witnesses and Medical Evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by three accused persons against their conviction by the trial court. The appellants, Rama Chandu Kale (accused N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Knife Attack Case — Accused's Intention to Cause Death Established by Fatal Blow on Chest. The court affirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased on the chest after a quarrel over carrom game money.

The appellant, Anil Jagannath Malve, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of the deceased and sentenced to life imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Land Dispute Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Assaulting Uncle with Wooden Stalk Confirmed Based on Eye Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Ukandrao Parasram Uike, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his uncle Tulsiram under Section 3...