Search Results for "agreement termination"

2079 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2079 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.

Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary District Judge for Unsatisfactory Performance. Termination under Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 is valid and not stigmatic.

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Rajendra Kadu, was appointed as a District Judge (direct recruitment) under the Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Lease under Madras Estate Abolition Act Due to Post-1945 Grant. Second Proviso to Section 20(1) of Madras Act XXVI of 1948 Renders Lease Void; Third Proviso Inapplicable.

The case involved a dispute over the termination of a lease for state quarries situated in the Venkatagiri Estate, which had been notified under Secti...