Search Results for "adverse finding"

3167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admit Second Appeals Challenging First Appellate Court's Reversal of Money Decree. Substantial Questions of Law Framed on Whether First Appellate Court Properly Considered Trial Court Findings and Whether Its Findings Were Perverse.

The appellants filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 74,37,500 against the respondent based on a memorandum of understanding executed on 01.01.2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Teacher Terminated Without Inquiry by Minority School. Termination Order Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Section 9 of MEPS Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Shaikh Wasim Shaikh Salim, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Hazi Leookman Urdu Primary School, run by respondent No.1 society,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellants Entitled to Possession of Suit Property Based on Title and Adverse Possession. Permissive occupation does not create ownership; respondent failed to prove adverse possession or valid title.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit plot and house. The original plaintiffs (now appellants) are the sons of Marotrao Dhobale, the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit land.

The appellant, Bajirao Ramchandra Shelar, filed two second appeals (Second Appeal No.494 of 1990 and Second Appeal No.495 of 1990) against the judgmen...