Search Results for "acquisition notice"

3052 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3052 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial Review Is Limited.

The petitioner, Corporation of the City of Panaji, challenged an award dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) under Section 48 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Decides First Appeal No. 107 of 1999 and Cross Objection No. 6 of 2000 in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. The appeal challenged enhancement of compensation from Rs.4.50-6 to Rs.89.25 per square metre under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a first appeal and cross objection arising from a land acquisition reference under the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Police Housing. Land Acquisition for Public Purpose Upheld as Compensation Determined Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, owners of land in Daund, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land by the State of Maharashtra for construction of residential q...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Writ Petition Concerning Lapsing of Land Reservation. Petitioners Claim Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Was Not Acted Upon by Authorities, Leading to Relief Sought.

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a declaration that the reservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...