Search Results for "Steel Control Order"

513 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 513 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Director in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Non-executive director cannot be held liable under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 without specific averments of being in charge of business.

The applicant, Devendra Vinaykant Sheth, was original accused No. 7 in R.C.C. No. 686 of 2004 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Criminal Appeals, Upholds Conviction of Six Accused for Murder under Sections 302, 120B, 149 IPC. Electronic Evidence from CCTV Footage, Despite Defective Section 65B Certificate, Considered Alongside Other Evidence to Confirm Guilt.

This judgment decides six criminal appeals against the conviction and life imprisonment of the accused for the murder of Jitendra Marotrao Gawande at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in Property Tax Assessment Dispute — Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Does Not Entitle Exemption from Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The appeal was filed by Akruti Nirman Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, Shri Vyomesh M. Shah, challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judge o...