Search Results for "Section 13(2) notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Section 13(2) notice"

1201 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1201 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Applicability of Section 292 IPC to Allegedly Obscene Poem Referencing Mahatma Gandhi Amidst Claims of Poetic License and Freedom of Expression. Court Clarifies That Poetic License Is Not a Legal License but a Fundamental Right, Subject to Reasonable Restrictions Under Article 19(2), and Obscenity Must Be Judged by Contemporary Community Standards.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case arose from the publication of a poem titled 'Gandhi Mala Bhetala' (I met Gandhi) in the July-August 1994 issue of the Bulletin, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

4 Sep 2023

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

1 Aug 2019

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

High Court

High Court Allows Application for Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Setting Aside of Award. Application Filed Within Limitation as Cause of Action Arose After Supreme Court Dismissed Special Leave Petition, and Period Between Previous Arbitration Commencement and Court Order Excluded Under Section 43(4) for Computing Limitation for Claims.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase Agreement executed on 8 December 2007 between Applicant as purchaser, Respondents as seller, and Percept Limit...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Heard Appeal Against Dismissal of Widow's Partition Suit. Court Examined Claim of Absolute Ownership Under Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act and Entitlement Under Jamkhandi State Act.

23 Dec 2005

The dispute pertained to the joint Hindu family estate of Sir Parshuram Bhau Patwardhan, the erstwhile ruler of Jamkhandi, who died in 1924. His secon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Revised Sanction for Prosecution of Police Officer Under IPC for Kidnapping. Question Whether Fresh Material Required for Second Sanction Order Under Section 197 CrPC and Bar of Section 161 Maharashtra Police Act.

23 Nov 2016

The instant criminal writ petition was filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Compliance with Section 173(2) CrPC for Chargesheet Contents — Emphasizes Need for Sufficient Details and Evidence in Police Reports. The Court held that chargesheets must contain sufficient details of facts and evidence, not merely reproduce the FIR, and clarified that arrest is not mandatory before filing chargesheet under Section 170 CrPC.

1 May 2024

The Supreme Court addressed concerns regarding the nature of chargesheets filed in some jurisdictions, where they merely reproduce the FIR without sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest and Surcharge in Settlement Commission Order for Block Assessment Years. Held that Settlement Commission cannot levy interest under Section 220(2) and surcharge under Section 113 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for block assessment years prior to the date of search.

25 Feb 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Karia Erectors Private Limited, challenged the legality and validity of orders passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Accused in Seva Bank Loan Fraud Case — Lack of Scheduled Offence and Non-Application of Mind in ECIR Registration. The court held that the ECIR was registered solely on the basis of FIR No.163/2018 involving Section 420 IPC, but the subsequent FIRs (525/2021, 526/2021, 527/2021) which included other scheduled offences were not considered, and the proceeds of crime were not properly identified, rendering the PMLA proceedings unsustainable.

29 Aug 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by individuals accused in connection with alleged loan fraud involving Seva Vikas Co-operative Ban...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)