Search Results for "Resolution Professional"

775 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 775 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounced Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Catering Policy Addendum. Petitioners Contended That Addendum Required Cabinet Approval, While Respondents Defended It as Within Competence and for Hygiene Improvement.

The South Western Railway Catering Contractors Association, a registered body of railway catering contractors, filed two writ petitions under Articles...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession in Property Identity Dispute. Plaintiff Established Use of Name Pushpa/Pushpalata Interchangeably and Held to Be True Owner of Flat Under Cooperative Society Share Certificate.

This suit involved a dispute between two sisters-in-law over the ownership of a residential flat in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Charitable Trust Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 9A Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961. CBDT Circulars Must Be Liberally Construed to Grant Relief When Delay Is Due to Change in Procedure from Manual to Electronic Filing.

The petitioner, Nav Chetna Charitable Trust, is a trust registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and runs educational institutions. F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Petition, Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Employment of Contractual Employee. Contractual Appointment with Breaks Does Not Automatically Confer Right to Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging an order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Government Circular Restricting MBA/MMS Admissions to Only MAH-CET, GMAT, and CAT Scores. The Court held that the circular was arbitrary and violated the legitimate expectation of students who had appeared for ATMA, MAT, GMAT, and XAT examinations.

The petitioners, three students who had appeared for the ATMA (AIMS Test for Management Admission) examination on 6 July 2020, challenged a Government...