Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Trap Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand Murlidhar Salvi, was a Senior Clerk in the office of the Executive Engineer, Implementation Wing, Town Planning, Yerwada, Pune. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Cognizance and Issuance of Process in CBI Corruption Case — Sanction Not Required for Private Persons Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves three revision applications filed by Iqbalsingh Soni, Sevasingh Kalra, and three others (Gurminder Singh Gill, A.S. Jagannatha Rao, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Peon in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Demand for Rs.300 for Certified Copies Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Raju Shantaram Kakphale, a peon in the Thane District Court, was convicted by the Special Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 7 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Harishchandra Mandalik, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant Kapile, was a Senior Clerk in the Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office, CIDCO, Aurangabad. The complainant, Dharamchan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sanjay Gopalrao Wangikar, an Extension Officer in the Social Welfare Section of Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, was convicted by the Special ...