Search Results for "Notice under Section 32(2)"

402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Termination of Teacher. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Earlier Enquiries Are Quashed for Non-Compliance of Rules 36/37 of MEPS Rules, 1981 Are Impermissible.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of the educational institution, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Premature Release of Life Convicts in NDPS Act Cases — Held That Detention Beyond 14 Years Without Consideration of Remission Is Illegal. The court directed the state to consider premature release under the remission policy dated 10.02.2010 and Section 433A CrPC.

The petitioners, Bandu Shivaji More, Prashant Krushandev Jadhav, and Satyawan Mahadev Suryavanshi, were convicted for offences under the Narcotic Drug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadequate Circumstantial Evidence and Defective Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Prove Complete Chain of Circumstances and Investigation Was Shoddy.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction where the appellants, husband and mother-in-law of the deceased, were convicted under Section 302 read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302/324 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove common intention and reliable eyewitness account.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for offences under Sections 302...