Search Results for "Major penalty"

948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Port Trust Demurrage Circular for Lack of Authority. Traffic Manager Cannot Levy Demurrage Without TAMP Approval Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The petitioners, M/s Kundil Sponge Iron Limited and its director Vijay Kashyap, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Industrial Court’s Remand Order; Reinforces Fairness in Proportionate Punishment in Labor Disputes. Unfair Labor Practice in Dismissal Addressed under the Doctrine of Proportionality.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, examined a labor dispute where the petitioner, a former employee, contested his dismissal on the grounds of unfai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Allegations of Encroachment on Government Land Led to Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3); Petitioners Argued Encroachments Were by Spouses, Not Themselves.

The petitioners were elected members of Gram Panchayat Kalamb, with petitioner no.1 elected as Sarpanch. Respondent nos.5 and 6 filed a complaint on 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058022017_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Contesting Election Without Permission. Regulation 48B of Bombay State Transport Employees Services Regulations Requires Prior Permission; Dismissal Upheld for Wilful Disobedience.

The appellant, Umesh Kalyanrao Galande, was a helper employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. He applied for permission to contes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...