Bombay High Court Quashes Port Trust Demurrage Circular for Lack of Authority. Traffic Manager Cannot Levy Demurrage Without TAMP Approval Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, M/s Kundil Sponge Iron Limited and its director Vijay Kashyap, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a circular dated 11 June 2009 issued by the Traffic Manager of Mormugao Port Trust. The circular imposed demurrage charges on coal/coke importers at specified rates, effective from 15 June 2009. The petitioners sought quashing of the circular and a direction to allow them to lift coal lying at the port yard. The petitioners argued that the Traffic Manager had no power under any law, rules, or regulations to issue such a circular, as the exclusive authority to prescribe rates for services under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, is vested in the Traffic Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) constituted under Section 47-A of the Act. The respondents contended that the circular was within their administrative powers. The court, after hearing both sides, held that the impugned circular was issued without legal authority and was ultra vires the Act. The court quashed the circular and directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to lift their coal without payment of the demurrage specified in the circular. The decision was based on the principle that statutory authorities cannot levy charges without express statutory backing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Ultra Vires - Demurrage Levy - Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Section 47-A - The Traffic Manager of Mormugao Port Trust issued a circular imposing demurrage charges on coal/coke importers. The court held that the power to prescribe rates for services is exclusively vested in the Traffic Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) under Section 47-A of the Act. The Traffic Manager lacked authority to issue such a circular, rendering it ultra vires and void. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Traffic Manager of Mormugao Port Trust had the authority to issue a circular imposing demurrage charges on coal/coke importers without the approval of the Traffic Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned circular dated 11/06/2009 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to allow the petitioners to lift the coal lying at the yard without payment of demurrage as per the impugned circular.

Law Points

  • Demurrage cannot be levied without authority under Major Port Trusts Act
  • 1963
  • Traffic Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) has exclusive power to prescribe rates
  • Circular issued by Traffic Manager without TAMP approval is ultra vires
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-GOA:2783-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 399 OF 2009

2019-09-25

M. S. Sonak, Nutan D. Sardessai

2019:BHC-GOA:2783-DB

Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik for the Petitioners; Mr. Y. V. Nadkarni and Ms. D. Shirgam, Advocates for the Respondents

M/s Kundil Sponge Iron Limited and Mr. Vijay Kashyap

Board of Trustees of the Mormugao Port Trust and the Traffic Manager

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a circular imposing demurrage charges.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of circular dated 11/06/2009 and direction to allow lifting of coal without demurrage.

Filing Reason

The Traffic Manager issued a circular imposing demurrage without authority.

Issues

Whether the Traffic Manager had authority to issue the demurrage circular. Whether the circular was ultra vires the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: The Traffic Manager has no power to levy demurrage; only TAMP can prescribe rates under Section 47-A. Respondents: The circular was within administrative powers.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to prescribe rates for services under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 is exclusively vested in the Traffic Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) under Section 47-A. The Traffic Manager lacks authority to impose demurrage, making the circular ultra vires.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned Circular dated 11.06.2009 provides that the demurrage shall be payable, inter alia by the Petitioners and other coal/coke importers at the rates specified in the Circular. Mr. Sardessai submits that the Respondents have absolutely no powers either under any law, rules or regulations to issue the impugned Circular, charging the demurrage in addition to the normal rent.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 399 of 2009 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the circular dated 11/06/2009. The matter was heard on 25/09/2019 and judgment delivered the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Major Port Trusts Act, 1963: Section 47-A
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in Recovery Suit. Part of Cause of Action Arising at Kolhapur Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 20(c) CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Port Trust Demurrage Circular for Lack of Authority. Traffic Manager Cannot Levy Demurrage Without TAMP Approval Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.