Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

679 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 679 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice — Land Owners Entitled to Hearing Before Demolition Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Principles of natural justice require notice and opportunity of hearing before demolition of alleged unauthorized construction under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 260 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

23 Feb 2012

The petitioners, Subhash Ramrao Jadhav, Khanderao Ramrao Jadhav, and Omprakash Ramrao Jadhav, are owners of lands bearing CTS Nos. 10908, 10909, 10910...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioner's Land Reservation Lapses Automatically Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 as Respondents Did Not Issue Declaration Under Section 126.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Purshotam Vishandas Raheja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

27 Nov 2020

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession. Reservation of land for Octroi Naka was withdrawn in 1975, and the Municipal Council failed to prove any subsisting right over the suit property.

28 Feb 2019

The present second appeal was filed by the Municipal Council, Amalner, challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession. Reservation for Octroi Naka Deleted in 1975, Municipal Council Cannot Claim Title or Eviction Without Acquisition Under Section 100 CPC.

28 Feb 2019

The present second appeal was filed by the Municipal Council, Amalner (original defendant) challenging the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment and Forfeiture by CIDCO — Directs Issuance of Demand Letter for Second Installment with Late Payment Charges. The court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of legitimate expectation, as CIDCO itself had sought relaxation of time limits under Regulation 15 of the New Bombay Disposal Land Regulations, 1975, which was approved by the State Government.

10 Sep 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Trishul Construction Co., was allotted three plots by CIDCO (respondent No.1) in 2007. The payment schedule required a first inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

24 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)