Search Results for "Cause of action"

398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Revisionary Authority on Jurisdiction Ground. Cause of Action Arises at Place of Revisionary Authority's Office Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Not Where Original Adjudication Order Was Passed.

The Bombay High Court dealt with a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of six writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Waqf Property Dispute. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Limitation Was a Mixed Question of Fact and Law.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Aurangabad Smart City Development Corporation Limited and the Municipal Corporation, Aurangaba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR registered at Ahmednagar quashed as cheque was drawn on Navsari bank and no cause of action arose within Ahmednagar under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, original accused in FIR No. I-382 of 2018 registered at Camp Police Station, Bhingar, Ahmednagar, for an offence under Section 138 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Clarifies Pleading Practice in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — Single Injunction Prayer Sufficient. The court held that separate prayers for infringement and passing off are unnecessary; a single prayer for injunction suffices regardless of the ground.

This judgment arises from an interim application in a commercial IP suit filed by Hindustan Unilever Ltd against an opposing party. The court had alre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Challenging Father's Marriage Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Family Court Erred in Holding That Earlier Suit for Declaration of Marriage as Void Was Barred by Res Judicata as Cause of Action Was Different.

The appellant, Mrs. Nayana M. Ramani, is the married daughter of late Mr. Navnitlal R. Shah. The respondent, Mrs. Fizzah Navnitlal Shah, claims to hav...