Search Results for "Building Plan Sanction"

857 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 857 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.

The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petition Challenging MIDC's Allotment of Amenity Plots and Regulations 2009 – Judgment Truncated. Incomplete text prevents determination of outcome.

The petitioner, an industrial association of small scale industries, filed writ petitions challenging the allotment of open spaces or amenity plots wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Sanction Procedure Under D.C. Regulations. Court Considers Whether First Come First Serve Principle Applies to Competing Applications for Slum Redevelopment Under Regulation 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for the City of Mumbai, 1991.

The petitioners, a proposed co-operative housing society of hutment dwellers residing on a plot of land measuring about 15,600 sq. mtrs. in Malad, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of NOC Requirement from Naval Authorities for Slum Rehabilitation Project. Security Guidelines and Stop Work Notice Challenged as Arbitrary and Without Statutory Backing.

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...