Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

831 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 831 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.

11 Jul 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Challenge to Arbitral Award in Indian Premier League Franchise Dispute. Award Directed Payment of Damages and Interest to Franchisee; Petition Alleges Patent Illegality and Excess of Jurisdiction by Arbitrator.

16 Jun 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body for crick...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.

10 May 2024

The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examined Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Fact Check Unit Provisions in IT Amendment Rules 2023. Petitioners Allege Violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), 21 and Ultra Vires of Section 79 and Section 87(2)(z),(zg) of Information Technology Act, 2000.

31 Jan 2024

The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.

17 Feb 2025

The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)