Search Results for "medical evidence corroboration"

2004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and FIR Timing.

The appellant, Mohd. Ishtiyak Ismile Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was found untrustworthy and not corroborated by other evidence.

The appellant, Nijam Chindhu Tadvi, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Jalgaon for the murder of Chayabai under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to lif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Trafficking of Minor Bangladeshi Girl for Prostitution Case. Testimony of Victim Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Circumstances Under Sections 366-A IPC, 4 and 5 of PITA, and Section 8(9) of Goa Children's Act.

The case involves an appeal against conviction of Smt. Anju Shah for offences under Sections 342, 323, 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 2012. Appeal Challenges Conviction for Rape, Kidnapping, and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Girl Under IPC Sections 376, 366A, 506(2).

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 410 of 2010, convicting the appellant/accused no.1 und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Laxman Janu Kokare, was convicted under Section 376(f) of the Indian Penal Code for the aggravated rape of a 9-year-old girl on 9 July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by the original accused nos. 5, 6, and 1 to 4 against their conviction under Section 302 read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Direct and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Affirmed as Prosecution Proved Homicidal Death and Accused's Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

Background: The case arose from an incident on 24 March 2013, where the deceased, Smt. Sarita Deepak Kedare, was found murdered in her residence at Dn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Case Under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Manoj Kantilal Nidhane and Punam Kantilal Dhandore by the Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradicted Each Other and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Navin Bhimrao Bansode, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as testimony of prosecutrix failed to inspire confidence.

The case involves two appeals filed by Samundersing Mahipal Sing and Rajnishkumar Sureshchandra Kumar against their conviction by the Additional Sessi...