Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and FIR Timing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mohd. Ishtiyak Ismile Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 323 IPC. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape of his minor daughter and two years rigorous imprisonment for causing hurt. The victim, who was studying in 4th standard at the time of the first incident, testified that her father forcibly had sexual intercourse with her after assaulting her with a belt. The abuse continued over several years, during which the victim became pregnant and was given tablets by her father to terminate the pregnancy. The victim eventually disclosed the abuse to her aunt, leading to the filing of an FIR. The appellant challenged the conviction on the grounds that the victim's testimony was unreliable and that there was a delay in lodging the FIR. The High Court, after examining the evidence, found the victim's testimony to be credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The court noted that the delay in filing the FIR was explained by the victim's fear and the appellant's threats. The court upheld the conviction and sentence, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the breach of trust by the father.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Rape of Minor Daughter - Section 376(2)(f) IPC - Conviction - The appellant was convicted for committing rape on his minor daughter over a period of time. The victim's testimony was found credible and corroborated by medical evidence and the timing of the FIR. The court held that the conviction was sustainable and the sentence of life imprisonment was appropriate. (Paras 1-21)

B) Criminal Law - Sentencing - Life Imprisonment - Section 376(2)(f) IPC - The court upheld the sentence of imprisonment for life till the death of the appellant, noting the heinous nature of the crime and the relationship of trust betrayed. (Paras 20-21)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and Section 323 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, are upheld.

Law Points

  • Rape of minor daughter
  • Section 376(2)(f) IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • life imprisonment
  • credibility of victim testimony
  • corroboration by medical evidence
  • delay in FIR explained
  • no consent by minor
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 32

Criminal Appeal No. 185 of 2016 with Interim Application No. 1 of 2019

2020-08-05

Prasanna B. Varale, Prakash D. Naik

Mr. Aashish Satpute (for appellant), Ms. P. P. Shinde (APP for respondent)

Mohd. Ishtiyak Ismile Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for rape and hurt.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for committing rape on his minor daughter and causing hurt.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, convicted the appellant under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and Section 323 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and two years rigorous imprisonment respectively.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC is sustainable? Whether the sentence of life imprisonment is appropriate?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the victim's testimony was unreliable and there was delay in lodging FIR. Respondent argued that the victim's testimony was credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of the victim in a rape case is credible and can be the basis of conviction if it inspires confidence. Delay in filing FIR is not fatal if explained. Medical evidence corroborates the victim's version.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 26th August 2014 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, thereby convicting the appellant for committing offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life till his death...

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, on 26th August 2014. He filed an appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Section 374 Cr.P.C. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 5th August 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376(2)(f), 323
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 374
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and FIR Timing.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.