Search Results for "long term agreement"

1924 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1924 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Water Supply Scheme. Court sets aside award to Respondent No.5 and directs fresh evaluation of petitioner's bid as per tender conditions.

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing plastic pipes and executi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Franchisee in EuroKids Trademark Dispute — Franchise Agreement Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Royalty and Breach of Terms. Court Restrains Respondent from Using Petitioner's Trademarks and Operating as Franchisee Pending Arbitration.

The petitioner, EuroKids International Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness for specific performance, but defendant must refund earnest money with 12% interest under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant (plaintiff) entered into a sale agreement dated 19.03.2010 with the respondents (defendants) for purchase of property bearing Survey No....