Search Results for "jurisdictional conflict"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "jurisdictional conflict"

485 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 485 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute — Upholds Majority Award on Misrepresentation of Receivables. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on misrepresentation and damages were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Mar 2012

The petitioner, GWL Properties Ltd. (formerly Gordon Woodroffe Ltd.), challenged a majority arbitral award dated 31 August 2009 under Section 34 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Roaming Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Security or Attachment Established. Court held that mere breach of contract does not entitle a party to interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, unless there is a serious dispute and balance of convenience in favor of the applicant.

28 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Vodafone Spacetel Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2019

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Share Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against EGM and Share Transfer. Court held that balance of convenience did not favour restraining the holding company from exercising its voting rights and that the appellants failed to establish a strong prima facie case for the relief sought.

13 Feb 2019

The case involves a dispute between the appellants (Ravi Arya, Nakul Arya, Sushma Arya, Varun Arya, and Ravi Arya HUF) and the respondents, including ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Event Production. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that the appellant corporation repudiated the agreement and is liable for damages under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

3 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge rejecting a Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

19 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Panchayat Samiti Member's Nomination to Market Committee Over Chairman's Claim — Rule 40A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Cannot Override Section 13(1)(d) of the Act. The court held that the Panchayat Samiti's resolution electing a member as its representative under Section 13(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is valid and cannot be overridden by Rule 40A of the Rules.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajeshri Arun Munghate, a member of the Panchayat Samiti, Gadchiroli, challenged an order of the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperativ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Foreign Trade Act Case -- Interpretation of Date of Notification as Gazette Publication Date -- Transitional Protection Granted to Importers With Prior Letters of Credit

21 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed civil appeals filed by Appellants against the Union of India, challenging a Notification imposing Minimum Import Price on st...

High Court

High Court Allows Application for Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Setting Aside of Award. Application Filed Within Limitation as Cause of Action Arose After Supreme Court Dismissed Special Leave Petition, and Period Between Previous Arbitration Commencement and Court Order Excluded Under Section 43(4) for Computing Limitation for Claims.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase Agreement executed on 8 December 2007 between Applicant as purchaser, Respondents as seller, and Percept Limit...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)