Search Results for "goods and services tax"

1015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application for Enforcement of Scheme in Sanghi Motors (Bombay) Limited. Scheme formulated under Sections 397, 398, 402 of Companies Act, 1956 involves transfer of oxygen undertaking assets and cylinders.

The matter pertains to Company Application No.328 of 1990 arising out of Company Petition No.128 of 1985, filed before the High Court of Judicature at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Appeal Against Permanent Injunction in Trademark Dispute Over ‘KITCHEN KING’ Brand. Trial Court Had Restrained Defendant from Using Deceptively Similar Mark and Awarded Damages.

The appeal arose from a judgment and decree dated 24.07.2017 in O.S. No.7/2012 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ballari. The plaintiff, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...