Search Results for "general order"

18723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.

The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Debt Recovery Matter — Debt Recovery Tribunal's Decree Constitutes a Final Judgment Under Section 9(2) of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The judgment debtor, Deepak Cochhar and another, filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/72 of 2004 issued by the Insolv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Ex-Parte Regular Appeal Filed by Defendant in Title Suit. Presumption of Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 Stands Unrebutted as Power of Attorney Holder Lacked Personal Knowledge to Lead Evidence.

The Civil Revision Petition arose out of a title suit (O.S. No. 466/2011) filed by one Smt. Akkayamma seeking declaration of title and permanent injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge of District Judge in NSEL Scam Case — Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of MJS Rules Violates Articles 14 and 311(2) as It Imposes Penalty Without Inquiry. The court held that discharge of a probationer without inquiry is punitive and unconstitutional.

The petitioner, Ajay Ramesh Dinode, was appointed as a District Judge by nomination in August 2014 and posted as Additional District and Sessions Judg...