Search Results for "employee personal details"

545 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Preliminary Objection in Election Petition No. 11 of 2009 Alleging EVM Tampering and Excess Expenditure. The Court Hears Arguments on Maintainability Under Sections 81(3) and 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The judgment pertains to an election petition filed by Dr. Madhavrao Kinhalkar, an independent candidate, challenging the election of Ashok Shankarrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs.

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Quo Warranto Petition Alleging Illegal Appointment Against Non-Notified BCT Post in KIADB. Petition Argues That Appointment in Contravention of Advertised Reservation Is Void Ab Initio Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, and ...