Search Results for "directory rules"

559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 21(5) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1989 Allowing Non-Judicial Member as President of Tribunal. Challenge to Appointment of IAS Officer as President Dismissed as Provision Does Not Violate Basic Structure.

The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and its President filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Bombay Village Panchayat Act Case Due to Procedural Violations. Motion Not Moved or Seconded and No Debate Held Before Voting, Rendering Resolution Void Under Rules 17 and 21-28 of Bombay Village Panchayat Meeting Rules, 1959.

The case arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Pali, Raigad district, under the Bombay Village Panchayat Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Head Master's Petition Against Reduction in Rank Without Enquiry. Management's Order of Reduction in Rank Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Raghunath Bapu Nangare, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher at Bhadole High School on 31 May 1993, effective from 1 June 1993, and h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Departmental Inquiry Against Headmaster Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Alleged Procedural Violations Including Defective Inquiry Committee and Denial of Statement of Allegations Examined.

The petitioner, a Headmaster of a private school governed by the MEPS Act and Rules, challenged his termination following a departmental inquiry. The ...