WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2018
4 Feb 2019The matter arises from a writ petition filed by Mandhana Industries Ltd, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, against an order o...
Search Results for "construction loans"
440 result(s) found
Found 440 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Application Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Subsidy Held as Revenue Receipt, Not Capital. The Court ruled that acceptance of subsidy as taxable income in the returns and before the Settlement Commission precluded later challenge, and the settlement order was final and binding.
4 Feb 2019The dispute arose from the petitioner, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, having received interest reimbursement subsidies und...
- 10
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011
7 Mar 2012The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...
- 17
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Time Extension Dispute — Holds Application Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After Expiry of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate. The court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to permit post-expiry extension applications, overruling the Calcutta High Court's decision in Rohan Builders.
1 Jan 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regar...
- 671
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.
4 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...
- 648
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in IBC Financial Creditor Classification Case — Security Deposit for Sales Promotion Not a Financial Debt. Held that a security deposit paid under a service agreement for sales promotion does not constitute a financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as there is no disbursal for time value of money or commercial effect of borrowing.
25 Apr 2024The Supreme Court allowed appeals against NCLAT judgments that classified security deposits paid by sales promoters as financial debts under the Insol...
- 557
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...
- 3738
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions in Securities Market Investigation Case, Upholding SEBI's Regulatory Authority. The Court rejected pleas for transfer of investigation to SIT and revocation of SEBI regulatory amendments, finding no apparent regulatory failure and emphasizing limited judicial review over SEBI's domain under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
3 Jan 2024The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution in February 2023, concerning allegations o...
- 269
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.
25 Feb 2022The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...
- 394
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.
1 Jan 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...
- 479
