High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "alternative remedies"
1002 result(s) found
Found 1002 result(s)
High Court
- 31
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Concerning Nursery Exemption in Land Acquisition for Dr. Shivarama Karanth Layout. Petitioner claims exemption under Government Order dated 01-01-1987 for nursery land acquired for layout formation.
25 Oct 2024Background: The case involves acquisition of land for the formation of a residential layout known as Dr. Shivarama Karanth Layout by the Bangalore Dev...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Between Mother-in-Law and Daughter-in-Law. Trial Court Restrained Daughter-in-Law from Entering Suit Flat, Allegedly Circumventing Family Court's Order Protecting Her Right to Residence.
19 Sep 2016The appeal arose from an order dated 19.07.2014 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Notice of Motion No.1959 of 2011 in S.C. Suit No....
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.
28 Feb 2014The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging IPAB's Dismissal of Trade Mark Rectification Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court Examines the Interplay Between Common Law Rights and Registered Trade Marks, Specifically Sections 27(2), 28, 47, and 57, in Context of Deceptive Similarity Between 'ROFOL' and 'PROFOL'.
3 Apr 2012The dispute between Medical Technologies Limited (petitioner) and Neon Laboratories Limited (respondent no.1) concerned the trade marks 'PROFOL' and '...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Article 227 Intervention in Arbitration Matter - Emphasizes Limited Scope of Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that the High Court should not have interfered with an interim order under Section 17 of the Act when the first appeal under Section 37 had been dismissed, as the Act is a self-contained code with limited judicial intervention.
4 Oct 2019The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s Deep Industries Limited (appellant) and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) (respondent) concer...
- 227
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.
23 Dec 2021The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Revokes Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Suit for Recovery of Loan Facilities — Defendant No. 5's Application Allowed as No Cause of Action Arose Within Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act, 1866 Requires Cause of Action to Arise Within Court's Limits; Mere Registered Office of Plaintiff Insufficient.
4 Feb 2013The Plaintiff, Future Corporate Resources Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of short-term loan facilities advanced to Defendant...
- 207
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Section 482 Cr.P.C. Petition Against Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act — Statutory Appeal Under Section 374 Cr.P.C. Is the Proper Remedy. Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be used as an alternative remedy when a statutory appeal is available.
14 Feb 2023The petitioner, Vuppalapati Satish Kumar, was accused No.2 in C.C.No.22746/2017 before the XXVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. ...
- 66
