Search Results for "advance deposit"

1279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Arbitration Dispute. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 by Remanding Matter to Arbitrator Despite Consent of Parties to Dispense with Cross-Examination.

The dispute arose out of a joint venture agreement dated 14.12.1996 between the appellants (joint owners of land) and the respondent (a construction c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Right to Argue in Execution Proceedings. Repeated Adjournments and Non-Compliance with Cost Order Justify Forfeiture Under Order 21 CPC.

The petitioner, Robert Meghraj Wanjari, was the judgment debtor in Special Summary Suit No.1 of 2010, where a decree was passed against him. He filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Local Body Tax Dispute — 'Disputed Tax' Under Section 406(8) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act Does Not Include Interest or Penalty. Pre-deposit condition for appeal satisfied by depositing only the tax amount, not interest or penalty.

The petitioner, Wintry Engineering And Chemicals Private Limited, challenged an order dated 22 February 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Local Body ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Service Tax Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Refundable deposit received from SEZ developer not taxable as service, and 10-year delay in issuing SCN violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Coventry Estates Pvt. Ltd. (formerly S and H Services Pvt. Ltd.), was engaged in construction of a residential complex in a Special Ec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Non-Compliance with Pre-Deposit Condition. Court holds that failure to deposit 25% of the amount due under Section 31(7) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 renders the petition not maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s. SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1...