Search Results for "acquittal under Section 201"

436 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Unnatural Death and Dowry Demand. State fails to prove foundational facts for presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act as death may have been accidental and no proximate harassment established.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (accused) by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Considers Death Reference and Appeals Against Conviction and Death Sentence for Gang Rape and Murder. Trial Court Found Accused Guilty Under Sections 302, 201, 366, 376(d) IPC and Imposed Death Penalty Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including DNA and Eyewitness Accounts.

The case arises out of the judgment and order dated 29 April 2022 passed by the Sessions Court, Kapadvanj, Kheda, in Sessions Case No. 12 of 2021, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Court finds that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as the sole eyewitness's testimony was unreliable and the medical evidence did not corroborate the alleged incident.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent accused by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence Awarded for Triple Murder and Appeal Challenging Conviction. Convict Argues Prosecution Evidence Including Dying Declarations and Eyewitness Testimony is Unreliable and Seizure Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act is Invalid.

The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench heard a reference for confirmation of death sentence and an appeal filed by the convict Imdad Ali Waid Ali Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Complainant Failed to Prove Loan and Signature. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Rebutted by Accused's Defence.

The appellant, Vishwanath s/o Kondaji Pote, was the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Proof of Homicidal Death. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as death could be accidental; benefit of doubt given.

The appellants, Smt. Hanifa Kitabulla Khan and three others, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, under Sections 302 and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Accused in NIA Case Under UAPA for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Trial. Appellant Granted Bail as Prosecution Failed to Establish Direct Link to Conspiracy in Antilia Bomb Scare Case.

The appellant, Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma, was accused No. 10 in a case registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under various sections of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 353, 294, 506 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ranjitsingh Gulabsingh Chungade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial 234/2002 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Bribery Case After Exoneration in Departmental Enquiry. Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as Identical Charges Could Not Be Established in Prior Enquiry and Tribunal Found No Evidence of Demand/Acceptance of Bribe.

The petitioner, a public servant working as a Tahasildar, was implicated in a bribery case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A complaint w...