Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

358 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 358 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against High Court Order Permitting Recall of Prosecutrix for Cross-Examination in Rape Case. Section 311 CrPC Recall Allowed Only if Testimony is Essential for Just Decision and Not to Fill Gaps in Defence.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Tripura which set aside the Trial Court's order rejecting an application under Section ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for POCSO Victim Under NALSA Scheme — Inadequate Compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 Enhanced to Rs. 10,50,000. The court held that the NALSA Scheme mandates minimum compensation of Rs. 7,00,000 for sexual assault victims, which can be enhanced by 50%.

27 Jun 2023

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha, mother of a minor victim of sexual assault, filed an appeal under Section 372 CrPC challenging the adequacy of compensati...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Child Custody in International Parental Abduction Case. Father's Petition for Repatriation of Minor Son from India to Germany Dismissed as Habeas Corpus Not Maintainable for Custody Disputes.

9 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Mr. Sankar Viswanathan, a German resident, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Sect...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

1 Jun 2022

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Section 14 Order Without Exhausting Alternative Remedy Under Section 17. The Court held that an order under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when an efficacious alternative remedy is available under Section 17 of the Act.

30 Nov 2021

The appellant, Sri Abdul Khader, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 05.12.2019 passed by the authorit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(a) of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 8 Application in Salary Recovery Suit. Employer's Application for Reference to Arbitration Allowed as Employment Contract Contained Arbitration Clause.

5 Nov 2020

The respondent, Mohan Kumar Thakur, filed a suit for recovery of salary dues and other amounts totaling Rs. 66,13,717/- with interest against his empl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Defence of Contributory Negligence Available in Structured Formula Claims. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Negligence of Deceased as Section 163A is a No-Fault Liability Scheme.

28 Apr 2020

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 20.06.2013 in M.V.C.No.301/2011 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T., Puttur, D.K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence Not Required for Structured Compensation. Court holds that for claims under Section 163-A, the claimant need not prove negligence; the 'arising out of use' requirement is satisfied if the vehicle was involved in the accident, even if the collision was not the direct cause of death.

27 Jun 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents and sister of Dinesh Kadam, a 22-year-old lift mechanic who died on 11 April 2007 aft...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)