CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "Security Interest Enforcement"
1406 result(s) found
Found 1406 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.
17 Apr 2023The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...
- 367
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Foreign Adoption Subject to Bond for Child's Repatriation. Welfare of Child Paramount in Inter-Country Adoption; Court Imposes Condition of Bond of Rs. 1,00,000 for Repatriation.
29 Oct 2010The case involves a Foreign Adoption Petition filed by Children of the World India Trust, a social worker, seeking permission for the adoption of a 4....
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act.
16 Jun 2026The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...
- 293
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Transportation Contract Dispute — Unilateral Rate Reduction Not Basis for Invoking Performance Bank Guarantees. Contractor's Refusal to Execute Work Orders Held Justified When Principal Unjustifiably Withheld Agreed Freight Rates Under Clause 3.3 of Contract.
21 Apr 2015The petitioner, a transport contractor, entered into a contract with the respondent Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. for transportation of materials...
- 45
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Earnest Money by KSFC in E-Auction Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner Claims Suppression of Pending Suit and Interim Order Affected Marketable Title, Rendering Auction Notification Fraudulent.
24 Sep 2019The petitioner, N. Lakshmana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Order Rejecting Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Recovery Suits — Held That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Law. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the suits based on invocation of bank guarantees were within limitation and disclosed a cause of action.
5 Jun 2023The present judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed by the Regional Manager and Assistant General Manager of Union Bank of India (o...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Holds Suit Not Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Plaintiffs, Claiming Independent Rights as Co-owners and Not Being Parties to Loan/Mortgage Transaction, Could Not Be Barred Under Section 34 as Their Suit Challenges Mortgage Validity Only Against Their Share, Not the Securitization Process Itself.
8 Dec 2010The dispute arose from a loan transaction between State Bank of India (appellant/first defendant) and Crosslink Shipbreakers (P) Ltd. (principal borro...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Restrain Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Contract Dispute — No Concluded Contract Found. Court quashes demand letters and directs status quo, holding that without a work order, there is no concluded contract and invocation is arbitrary.
2 Jun 2023The petitioner, PG Setty Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...
- 157
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Oral Tenancy After Mortgage Not Protected. Tenant's claim of tenancy based on oral agreement after mortgage creation cannot defeat bank's right to take possession under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.
11 Sep 2019The present appeal arises from an order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, dated 31.12.2014, rejecting the application of the ap...
- 330
