Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1027 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1027 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape Case, Affirms Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix. Evidence of Prosecutrix in Rape Case Held to Be of Same Value as Injured Witness; Conviction Can Be Based on Her Sole Testimony If It Inspires Confidence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Lok Mal @ Loku against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court affirming his conviction unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Gang Rape Accused Despite 3-Year Incarceration, Citing Prima Facie Evidence and Seriousness of Offence Under Section 376(D) IPC. Speedy Trial Violation Claim Rejected as Charge Framed and Trial to Be Expedited.

The applicant, Nitesh Raghunath Lahange, filed a second bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release in connection with Crime No. I-1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 376 IPC.

The case pertains to the alleged rape and murder of Sonali Vasant Deshpande by the accused Rohan Pushpraj Fanasgaonkar on 27 July 2004 at a hotel in L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Milind s/o Govind Pandit, was convicted by the IV Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.17/2003 on 1/10/2003 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition to Cancel Bail in Rape Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misuse of Bail Found. The court held that cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC requires supervening circumstances or misuse of liberty, not mere disagreement with the bail order.

The State of Karnataka, through Alur Police, filed a petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking cancellation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Affirms Conviction Upholds Justice Despite Previous Acquittals. Ensuring Justice Prevails: Court Upholds Conviction Despite Challenges, Highlights Significance of Victim Testimony

The respondents were convicted by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for an incident dating back to 1989. They were senten...