Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Seeking to Quash Private Complaint and FIR for Offences Under Sections 354A, 500, 506, 120B IPC. Multiple Accused Challenge the Proceedings as Abuse of Process of Law.
9 Aug 2024...
Search Results for "Oral termination"
2334 result(s) found
Found 2334 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions by Workers Against Tata Motors Limited in Industrial Disputes Under Section 2-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioners Sought Certiorari to Quash Labour Court Incidental Orders and Claimed Reinstatement Due to Alleged Unfair Labour Practices.
26 Feb 2022The judgment under analysis involved a group of 52 workmen who filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders and awards of ...
- 13
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Petitions for Benefit of Government Resolution Dated 17-10-1988 for Daily Wagers in Irrigation Department. Court Directs Consideration of Service from Initial Appointment Date for Pay Commission Benefits with Arrears.
20 Mar 2026The case involves five Special Civil Applications filed by daily wagers in the Irrigation Department of Gujarat, seeking modification of an order date...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Probationary Employee Due to Stigmatic Order Without Inquiry — Deemed Confirmation After Expiry of Extended Probation Period. Termination order based on allegations of misconduct and unsatisfactory work is stigmatic and requires disciplinary inquiry; employee deemed confirmed after expiry of extended probation period without any order.
28 Feb 2025The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Srivastava, was appointed as Airport Director of Shirdi Airport by the Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (M...
- 1127
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition to Appoint Sole Arbitrator in Mining Lease Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in the agreement is sufficient to refer parties to arbitration under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
10 May 2016The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The first petition was filed by ...
- 160
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition for Interim Injunction in Media Rights Dispute; Allegations of Fraud and Collusion Cast Doubt on Validity of Agreements. Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
20 Dec 2010The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by World Sport Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. against the ...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Dismissing Interlocutory Applications. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Seek Certiorari Against Orders Dated 18.06.2025 in Various KID Proceedings.
19 Jan 2026The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard and reserved judgment on a batch of writ petitions filed by BDK Valves Private Limited, a company in...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Approver in MCOCA Case Due to Long Incarceration and No Likelihood of Trial Conclusion. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Prevails Over Stringent Provisions of MCOCA.
9 Nov 2023The applicant, Danish Ali Jamaluddin Ahmed, was arrested on 1 December 2018 in connection with FIR No. 326 of 2018 (later renumbered as FIR No. 36 of ...
- 221
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Director’s Challenge to Arbitral Award in Factoring Facility Dispute — Upholds Award Despite Claims of Forged Guarantee and Procedural Lapses. Arbitral Tribunal’s Award Allowing SBI Global Factors’ Claim of Rs.43.45 Crores Jointly and Severally Against Guarantor and Principal Debtor Not Found Patent Illegality Under Section 34.
23 Dec 2025This judgment relates to a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Sanjeev Malhotra, a former director and sh...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petitions Challenging Two IPL Franchise Arbitration Awards. Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Payment of Rs.384.83 Crore and Return of Rs.153.34 Crore Bank Guarantee with 18% Interest, Which the Franchisor Contested on Jurisdictional and Merits Grounds.
17 Jun 2025The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreements between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Kochi fra...
