Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Change of Land Reservation from Parking to Bus Terminus in Pune — Violation of Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Change of reservation without following mandatory procedure under Section 37 of the MRTP Act, 1966 is illegal and unsustainable.

3 May 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by landowners in Pune challenging the change of reservation of their land from parking to a bus terminu...

High Court

Writ Petition Dismissed on Land Development Rights. A dispute over land acquired for a public bus depot leads to rejection of development claims by private landowners, with the court emphasizing public interest over private rights.

27 Sep 2024

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) along with other respondents, the Bombay High Court dismissed the petition. The Petitione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition in 1960s Case — Section 6 Declaration Issued Within One Year of Section 4 Notification, No Lapse Occurred.

3 Jul 2026

The petitioners, owners of lands in Borla and Deonar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

13 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Entrustment of Playground Land to Samiti for Development and Maintenance. Municipal Corporation's Decision to Entrust Land on Caretaker Basis for Playground Construction Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

23 Feb 2006

The appellants, Sarvajanik Shri Ganeshotsav Mandal and its president Sanjay Sawant, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their writ petition by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

8 Aug 2011

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Prosecution Under MRTP Act Due to Limitation Bar — Non-Compliance with Demolition Notice Held Not a Continuing Offence. The Court held that offence under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, is complete upon failure to comply with notice within prescribed period, and the mere continuance of unauthorized construction does not keep the offence alive for purposes of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C.

12 Feb 2013

The petitioners, who were accused in a criminal case under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenged the rejection of their ple...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Communication Rejecting Purchase Notice for Want of Hearing and Directs Fresh Decision Under Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. Natural Justice Mandates Grant of Hearing to Sender of Purchase Notice When Third-Party Objections Regarding Ownership Are Raised, Even If Section 127 MRTP Act Is Silent.

9 Dec 2021

The dispute arose from the failure to implement a reservation for a children’s park in the Khamgaon city Development Plan, which was revised and cam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA in Favor of Housing Societies. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA even if the developer retains development rights over part of the land.

18 Jun 2026

The Petitioner-Developer, Kiran Builders Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15 May 2017 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societ...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)