Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961"

417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under MIDC Act — Notice and Notification Upheld as Valid. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality in acquisition proceedings under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1961.

The petitioners, Baban Haribhau Yadav, Mansingh Haribhau Yadav, and Pratap Haribhau Yadav, owned and possessed agricultural land bearing plot No.425, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits Under Zilla Parishad and Jeevan Pradhikaran Rules. Court Holds That Prior Service as Daily Wagers Counts Towards Qualifying Service for Pension After Absorption.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Latur, and Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Quo Warranto Against Elected Adhyaksha of Zilla Panchayat on Ground of Caste Qualification. Court Directs Caste Verification Committee to Expedite Inquiry into Caste Certificate Validity.

These two intra-court appeals arose from the order dated 21.09.2017 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P. No.106417/2016. The writ petition was fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Housing Authority's Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Release Notification. Fraud by Land Owners in Obtaining Release Justifies Cancellation Without Fresh Acquisition Under Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against a High Court order that set aside a notification cancelling the release ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Withdrawal from Land Acquisition for Gavipuram Extension Layout. Court Holds That Section 48(1) Notification Not Gazetted Is Ineffective and Acquisition Completed in 1987 Bars Withdrawal.

The petitioners, legal representatives of original grantees of 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 26 of Nagadevanahalli Village, Bangalore, soug...