Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

557 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 557 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Return of Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Town Planning Dispute — Court Lacks Jurisdiction Under Section 149 of MRTP Act, Need Not Decide Other Issues on Merits. Once Jurisdiction Is Found Absent, Court Becomes Functus Officio and Must Return Plaint Without Adjudicating Other Issues.

15 Dec 2006

The case arose from a suit filed by Jagdish Hari Thatte and six others against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and the State of Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

30 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Period Governed by Amended Section 127(1) as on Date of Notice, Not Date of Reservation Notification. The court held that the amended period of 24 months applies to a purchase notice issued after the amendment, and the petition was premature.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.34/3/5/2 at Village Ambegaon, Budruk, Pune, sought a declaration that the reservation of their land ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Demolition Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' structure demolished without notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and court orders restoration.

8 Sep 2023

The petitioners, occupiers of a plot of land in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 15 June 2023 passed by the Executive Engineer of the Bri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Writ Petition for TDR Against Construction of Development Plan Road. Municipal Corporation's Rejection of TDR Application Set Aside as Unreasonable and Contrary to Development Control Regulations.

15 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Siddhi Real Estate Developers, a partnership firm, constructed a development plan road at its own cost within the limits of Thane...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction as Not Maintainable Due to Personal Interest and Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner failed to disclose pendency of civil suit and lacked bona fide public interest, making PIL an abuse of process.

28 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Sharad Nago Chinawale, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Deprecates Malegaon Municipal Corporation for Dereliction of Duty in Removing Unauthorized Constructions. Purchase Notice under Section 127 MRTP Act Not Adjudicated Due to Pending Inter Se Disputes.

4 Nov 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition filed by ten individuals claiming ownership of plot bearing survey number 110/B in Malega...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).

3 Apr 2019

The case involved three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a Resolution date...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)