Search Results for "Bombay Police Act 1951"

670 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 670 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders for Lack of Material and Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Show cause notices lacked specific instances, violating the right to represent.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Officers for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 170 BNSS. The court held that the police officers were acting in discharge of official duty and no sanction was obtained, hence the FIR is quashed.

The petitioners, three police officers attached to Kharghar Police Station, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 48...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56 of Bombay Police Act Due to Lack of Satisfaction Regarding Public Harm. Failure to Record That Petitioner's Activities Caused Alarm or Danger to Person or Property Renders Externment Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Krishna Vijay Lalbegi, challenged an externment order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 56 of the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case for Non-Filing of Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 167(2) CrPC Default Bail Entitlement Not Extinguished by Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet After Application.

The petitioners, seven individuals arrested in connection with Crime No.47/2022 for offences under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148 read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows DNA Test in Partition Suit to Determine Paternity Under Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC. The court upheld the appellate court's order for DNA testing to establish the relationship between the parties in a partition suit.

The petitioner, Sri Hanumappa, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13.1.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge at Hiriyur in R.A.No.11/201...