Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1524 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1524 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Order of Asset Disclosure and Injunction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds disclosure direction but modifies injunction to apply only to assets sufficient to secure the claim amount.

10 Mar 2022

The case involves a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Manish Khera and another (petitioners) challengi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears multiple arbitration petitions filed by various petitioners against the same respondent. The petitions, bearing consecutive numbers, seek relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions, Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution of Firm Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jun 2013

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

4 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

1 Nov 2022

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Holds That Objections to Enforceability Must Be Raised Under Section 48 and That Pendency of Civil Suit Does Not Bar Execution.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves two special leave petitions filed by LMJ International Ltd. and Sri Munisuvrata Agri International Ltd. against Sleepwell Industries...

32 33 34 35 36

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)