Search Results for "rule absolute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "rule absolute"

12138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12138 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

21 Oct 2019

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Order Refusing to Vacate Ex-Parte Injunction in Trespass Suit. Defendant Granted Opportunity to Contest Interim Relief on Merits as Non-Appearance Due to Legal Advice Did Not Amount to Deliberate Neglect.

12 Aug 2011

The litigation originated from a suit for perpetual injunction filed by the plaintiff-respondents to restrain trespass on the suit property. Along wit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint Against Defendant Directors in NSEL Suit for Lack of Averments and Immunity Under IFC Act. The court held that vague allegations without specific averments do not constitute a cause of action, and an IFC employee is immune from suit for official acts under the International Finance Corporation (Status, Immunities and Privileges) Act, 1958.

23 Sep 2015

The Bombay High Court disposed of two notices of motion filed by Defendant Nos. 14 and 15 in a suit by National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) against v...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Applications for Deletion of Defendants. The Court Examines Whether Directors and Former Employees Are Necessary Parties in a Suit for Breach of Contract Under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

22 Jan 2026

The matter concerns a writ petition filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Challenge to State's Rejection of Premature Release for Life Convict. Convict's Petition Seeks Acceptance of SSRB Recommendation Despite Negative Opinion from Convicting Court.

6 Aug 2026

The petitioner, a life convict, filed a criminal writ petition seeking directions to the State Government to accept the recommendation of the State Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.

18 Jul 2022

The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Points Framed by Trial Court in Execution Proceedings Under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC — Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree. Executing Court Must Restrict Inquiry to Executability of Decree, Not Its Validity; Points Regarding Binding Nature of Consent Terms, Prior Approvals, and Rejection by General Body Are Impermissible.

14 Dec 2011

The dispute arose from execution proceedings following a consent decree passed in Suit No. 5142 of 1991 by the City Civil Court at Bombay. The petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Cross-Examination in NI Act Case - Right Under Section 145(2) Not Conditional on Written Statement. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is absolute and not dependent on filing a written statement, setting aside the trial court's rejection order.

9 May 2023

The petitioner, Rakesh Singh, filed two criminal writ petitions challenging the order dated 07/10/2023 passed by the trial court in two complaints und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows New Law College and Additional Courses Despite State Government's Inaction — Mandamus Issued for Compliance with Bar Council of India and University Requirements. The court directed the State to decide applications within two weeks, failing which approvals deemed granted.

8 Sep 2015

The petitioners, Habib Educational & Welfare Society and Aldel Education Trust, filed writ petitions seeking directions to the State of Maharashtra to...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)