Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"

672 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Served After 18 Years, No Acquisition Within 24 Months, Reservation Deemed Lapsed. The court held that the Director of Town Planning correctly declared the reservation lapsed as the statutory conditions under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 were met.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Subhashchandra Hukumchand Khurana, owned agricultural land in Mouza Warud, District Amravati, within the limits of Municipal Council, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entries in Mutation Proceedings — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Decide Based on Possession and Revenue Records, Not Title Disputes.

25 Apr 2024

The petitioners, Navin Popatlal Shah and Nitin Sundraji Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay H...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Physical Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, as Per Overruled Precedent.

17 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KIADB Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Preliminary Notification and Section 28(3) Notification Held Abandoned Due to Non-Completion of Acquisition Within Reasonable Time. Land Acquisition Lapse Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 — Delay of Over 13 Years Without Possession or Compensation Leads to Abandonment.

30 May 2022

The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

7 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

4 Jul 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance with Section 41(1) Proviso and Lapse of Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings. Acquisition Notification Held Invalid as Land Already Vested in State Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Was Not Available for Acquisition Under MHADA Act.

31 Jan 2012

The case involves a challenge to the acquisition of land bearing Survey No. 113/3 and 115/6 at Solapur under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Developm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Primary School — Resolution to Abandon Acquisition of Adjoining Land Does Not Extend to Petitioner's Land. The court held that a Municipal Council's resolution to abandon acquisition of Survey No. 34/1 and demand refund of the entire amount does not imply abandonment of acquisition of Survey No. 34/3, as the resolution specifically mentions only Survey No. 34/1.

17 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of Survey No. 34/3 in Chandrapur, challenged the acquisition of their land under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Dereservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. The court held that mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps for acquisition under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

30 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Madanlal Lalchand Jain, owned land bearing S.No. 38/3 at Nandurbar. The Assistant Director of Town Planning published a draft developm...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition in Konkan Railway Project — Market Value Fixed at Rs.145 per sq. meter Based on Comparable Sales and Development Potential. The court affirmed the Reference Court's determination under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rejecting both the acquiring body's appeal and the landowners' cross-objections.

23 Feb 2005

The case involves an appeal and cross-objections against a judgment/award dated 15-9-2000 of the Additional District Judge, Panaji, which enhanced com...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)