Search Results for "implied bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "implied bar"

886 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 886 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Recall of Annulment Order in Insolvency Case Due to Concealment of Creditor. Appellant Insolvent Failed to Disclose Kotak Mahindra Bank as Creditor with DRT Recovery Certificate, Leading to Recall of Annulment Under Section 22(1) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

31 Mar 2021

The case involves an appeal filed by Akshay D. Thakkar (the Appellant/Insolvent) against an order dated 18th September, 2018 passed by a learned Singl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Mandamus to Register FIR in Economic Offences Case — No Mandatory Duty to Register FIR on Private Complaint Without Preliminary Inquiry. Court Holds That Police Have Discretion to Conduct Preliminary Inquiry Before Registering FIR Under Section 154 CrPC, and Writ of Mandamus Cannot Be Issued to Compel Registration.

26 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Charu Kishor Mehta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Laytime and Demurrage Clauses. Court holds that Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or correction of errors of law unless award is patently illegal or perverse.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Puyvast Chartering B.V. (owner) and M/s. Puyvast Maritime India Ltd. (agent), challenged an arbitral award dated 28 February 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Fourth Child Born After Cut-off Date Despite Child's Death. The birth of a live child after the cut-off date constitutes an increase in the number of children under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the subsequent death of the child does not attract the protection of the first proviso.

13 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Patiram @ Ratiraj Shirbhiye, was elected as Member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadala on 28-8-2005. Respondent No.3, Go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Holds That Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Oral Agreement That Document Was Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. The court ruled that a defendant need not file a separate suit for specific performance to rely on an agreement of reconveyance as a defence.

17 Dec 2019

The present second appeal arises from a property dispute between the original plaintiff (respondent) and the original defendant (appellant). The plain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Civil Court Cannot Regularise Encroachment on Forest Land in Contravention of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Government Resolution of 1979 Cannot Override Section 2 of the Act.

17 Jan 2013

This is a reference made by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kannad under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking answers to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Stay on Transfer Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Transfer of Workmen During Pendency of Industrial Disputes Constitutes Prima Facie Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

13 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an interim order dated 23rd December 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) No.4...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Question of Excepted Clauses in Government Contracts to Larger Bench — High Court Erred in Relying on Bharat Drilling Without Analyzing Contractual Clauses. The issue of whether prohibitory claim clauses bind the Arbitral Tribunal requires authoritative determination by a larger bench.

5 Dec 2025

The State of Jharkhand appealed against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which allowed a Section 37 appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded Contract but Continuous Offer, Plaint Discloses Cause of Action.

17 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s. Everhome Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15.07.2019 against the respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)