Search Results for "firm name"

2374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances. Will executed by testatrix with firm signature and solicitor-drafted formality upheld as valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Chittaranjan N. Negandhi, sought probate of a Will dated 24th May 1973 left by his mother, Bhanumati Narottamdas Chapsi. Bhanumati died...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Tender Bid in Coal Transportation Contract. Joint Venture Experience Must Be Considered Collectively, Not Individually, Under Tender Conditions.

The petitioner, M/s. P.M.S. and S.T.C.JV, a joint venture, challenged the communication dated 12/05/2022 issued by respondent No.1, Western Coal Field...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Long Incarceration. The court held that mere partnership in a firm does not establish conscious possession of contraband under Section 43 of NDPS Act, and long custody without trial warrants bail.

The petitioner, Chandru Kunthur Raghuvegowda, a partner of M/s. Overseas Express, filed a petition under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail in Crime No.893...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Proceedings for Lack of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act. Directors Contend Complaints Merely Name Them Without Alleging Active Role in Day-to-Day Affairs.

The case concerns multiple criminal petitions filed by Kavitha Chopra and Dhirendra Chopra, directors of OSIA Hyper Retail Limited, seeking to quash p...