Search Results for "compromise order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "compromise order"

1656 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1656 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants to File Written Statement in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Delay Condoned Due to Lack of Notice and Sufficient Cause. The court held that the trial court ought to have taken a liberal view and condoned the delay in filing the written statement under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, as the defendants had a right to contest the suit on merits and the delay was not intentional.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioners, who were defendants in O.S.No.6525/2012 before the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, filed writ petitions under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Official Assignee Can Adjudicate Claims Without a Pre-existing Decree Under Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Legal Question Framed for Determination Concerning the Scope of the Official Assignee's Adjudicatory Powers Under Sections 6, 46, and 48 of the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

2 Jul 2026

The matter arose out of two insolvency petitions where a creditor lodged a claim with the official assignee. The official assignee took the position t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioner Entitled to be Heard Before Compromise Decree Affecting Her Rights. The court held that a person whose rights are directly affected by a compromise decree in a subsequent suit is a necessary and proper party under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, and the trial court erred in rejecting the impleading application.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Narayanamma, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (OS 2289/2007) against respondents 1 to 3 based on an agreement to...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Depositors' Petition Challenging Winding Up of Cooperative Bank — No Locus Standi for Individual Depositors Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Winding Up Order Under Section 107 of MCS Act is Final and Cannot Be Challenged by Individual Depositors; Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages.

21 Sep 2006

The petitioners, Manda Ananda Salunkhe, Dropadabai Laxman Nalawade, and Mrs. Jatin Enterprises, were depositors and shareholders of Yeshwant Sahakari ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Award in Execution Proceedings. Lok Adalat Award Under Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Is Final and Binding and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 47 CPC.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Dhanraj Dnyaneshwar Koche, along with respondent No.2, owned an agricultural field and entered into an agreement to sell it to respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement Involving Gift of Shares and Reduction of Securities Premium Account. The court held that a scheme involving a gift of shares held by a company in another company to its shareholders and a reduction of the securities premium account by the book value of the investment is an arrangement under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and the reduction of the securities premium account does not require compliance with the procedure for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956 or Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Indian Seamless Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of a schem...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC for Alleged Violation of Injunction Order. Court holds that mere filing of a suit for permanent injunction does not automatically establish willful disobedience of an interim order without proof of specific notice and deliberate defiance.

23 Feb 2021

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC alleging that the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Family Dispute Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 read with 34 IPC quashed as parties amicably settled their differences through mediation.

11 Dec 2014

The applicant, Syeda Badar Jahan, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Quash Petition in Rash Driving Death Case Due to Compromise with Victim's Family. Court Holds That Offences Under Sections 125(a), 125(b) IPC and Section 185 MV Act Are Private in Nature and Can Be Quashed Under Section 528 BNSS.

9 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Balaji, was the sole accused in Crime No.51/2024 registered at Thuvarankurichi Police Station, Trichy District, for offences under Sec...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)