Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"

960 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 960 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Bangalore Development Authority Against Order to Compensate Land Owner for Unauthorized Use. Court Rules That Taking Private Property Without Acquisition Proceedings Violates Constitutional Right Under Article 300-A.

The case involved a dispute over private land owned by P.G. Belliappa, which was taken over by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) without any a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petition Due to Non-Application of Correct Market Value. Petitioner's Land Acquired in 2008 for Satara Municipal Council, Court Directs Recalculation Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, owned land in Satara that was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Satara Municipal Council under the Land Acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Lapsed as Compensation Was Deposited with Collector But Not Paid to Landowners, Failing Statutory Requirement.

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals involving common questions of law and fact regarding land acquisition proceedings. The background inv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 4 and Declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as acquisition was for public purpose of resettlement of displaced persons.

The petitioners, heirs of Ramchandra Desai @ Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Notificati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Specific Plot Allotment Under 12.5% Rehabilitation Scheme for Navi Mumbai Project. Petitioner's claim for allotment from Sector 5, New Panvel rejected as CIDCO offered alternative land in linkage sector under Government Resolutions.

The petitioner, Shri Ashok Ganu Shelke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking allotment of land under the 12.5% rehabilitation sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Compensation Enhancement in Acquisition for Rehabilitation. Market value fixed at Rs. 67,500 per hectare based on sale instances and land suitability under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two appeals arising from a judgment and award dated 30.11.1996 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amravati in L.A.C. No.92/...