Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Specific Plot Allotment Under 12.5% Rehabilitation Scheme for Navi Mumbai Project. Petitioner's claim for allotment from Sector 5, New Panvel rejected as CIDCO offered alternative land in linkage sector under Government Resolutions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Ashok Ganu Shelke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking allotment of land under the 12.5% rehabilitation scheme for project affected persons of the Navi Mumbai project. The petitioner's ancestral land in village Asudgaon, Panvel, Raigad was acquired in 1970 for the development of New Bombay. The State Government formulated a rehabilitation scheme under Government Resolutions dated 6th March 1990 and 28th October 1994, known as the '12.5 percent Scheme'. CIDCO, the New Town Development Authority under Section 113(3A) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, determined that the petitioner was eligible for allotment of 2825 sq.mtrs. of land. Out of this, a plot of 400 sq.mtrs. was allotted in village Asudgaon, and CIDCO expressed readiness to allot the remaining area in a linkage sector in Kamothe node, similar to other project affected persons of Asudgaon village. The petitioner, however, insisted that all land must be allotted from Sector 5, New Panvel, and sought allotment of Plot No.46 in that sector, along with cancellation of the plot allotted to the fifth respondent. The court considered the submissions and the affidavit in reply filed by CIDCO, which clarified that after the Government Resolution of 6th March 1990, meetings were held with project affected persons, including a meeting on 17th September 1998 where representatives including an MP and MLAs were present. The court held that the petitioner had no vested right to a specific plot and that CIDCO's offer of alternative land in a linkage sector was reasonable and consistent with the rehabilitation scheme. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Rehabilitation and Resettlement - Project Affected Persons - 12.5% Scheme - Allotment of Land - The petitioner, a project affected person under the Navi Mumbai development, sought allotment of land specifically from Sector 5, New Panvel, and cancellation of plot allotted to the fifth respondent. CIDCO offered alternative land in a linkage sector. The court held that the petitioner has no vested right to a specific plot and that the authority's decision to allot land in a linkage sector was reasonable and in accordance with the rehabilitation scheme. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to allotment of land under the 12.5% rehabilitation scheme specifically from Sector 5, New Panvel, and whether the allotment made to the fifth respondent should be cancelled.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Rehabilitation scheme
  • Project affected persons
  • Allotment of land
  • Government Resolution
  • 12.5 percent scheme
  • Writ jurisdiction
  • No vested right to specific plot
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (04) 48

Writ Petition No.2747 of 2005

2006-04-27

Kshitij R. Vyas, C.J., Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.

Mr. P.B. Naiknaware for the Petitioner, Mrs. P.M. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1, Mr.G. S. Hegde for Respondent No.2, Mr.S. I. Jaykar for Respondent No.5

Shri Ashok Ganu Shelke

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking allotment of land under rehabilitation scheme and cancellation of allotment to another party.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought allotment of plot No.46 in Sector 5, New Panvel, and cancellation of plot allotted to the fifth respondent.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed entitlement to land from Sector 5, New Panvel under the 12.5% rehabilitation scheme, but CIDCO offered land in a linkage sector.

Issues

Whether the petitioner has a vested right to allotment of land from a specific sector under the 12.5% rehabilitation scheme. Whether the allotment made to the fifth respondent should be cancelled.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that all land must be allotted from Sector 5, New Panvel. CIDCO submitted that the petitioner is entitled to 2825 sq.mtrs., out of which 400 sq.mtrs. was allotted in Asudgaon, and the remaining can be allotted in a linkage sector in Kamothe node, as per the scheme.

Ratio Decidendi

A project affected person under a rehabilitation scheme does not have a vested right to allotment of a specific plot or from a specific sector. The authority's decision to allot land in a linkage sector, consistent with the scheme and after consultations, is reasonable and not subject to interference in writ jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

In the reply filed in these proceedings on behalf of the Second Respondent, it has been stated that under the area earmarked for allotment of land under the 12.5 percent Scheme, the Petitioner was eligible for allotment of land admeasuring 2825 sq.mtrs. against land acquired from village Asudgaon. In these proceedings the Petitioner seeks to assert that all the land that must be allotted to the Petitioner must be necessarily from Sector 5, New Panvel.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.2747 of 2005 before the Bombay High Court. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 27th April 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 113(3A)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Specific Plot Allotment Under 12.5% Rehabilitation Scheme for Navi Mumbai Project. Petitioner's claim for allotment from Sector 5, New Panvel rejected as CIDCO offered alternative land in linkage sector un...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Persons with Benchmark Disabilities in Auditor Posts Under RPwD Act, 2016. The court held that candidates with specific learning disability and mental illness are entitled to appointment in Group C posts identifie...