FIRST APPEAL NO.514 OF 2014
16 Jan 2020The appeal arose from a suit dismissed by the trial court for mandatory injunction seeking execution of an agreement for sale of a flat under the Maha...
Search Results for "builders/developers"
663 result(s) found
Found 663 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 87 of Arbitration Act as Unconstitutional — Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Revived by 2019 Amendment Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14. The court held that the provision reintroducing automatic stay upon filing of a Section 34 application is manifestly arbitrary and contrary to the object of the 2015 Amendment Act.
27 Nov 2019The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, i...
- 273
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging District Deputy Registrar's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Registrar's Order Quashed as It Was Passed Without Hearing the Petitioner Society and Without Considering Its Objections Under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
10 Jul 2023The petitioner, Garodia Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., through its Honorary Secretary, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15th June,...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Compliance with DCR 2018 — Held that Construction Approved Prior to DCR 2018 is Not Subject to New FSI Restrictions. Vested rights of the petitioners were upheld as the building was substantially completed before the new regulations came into force.
26 Sep 2023The petitioners, Sai Chintan C.H.S.LTD. and MPR Builders and Developers LLP, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 20.12.2022 is...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Tax Dispute Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 — Petitioner's Declaration Wrongly Rejected as Ineligible. Designated Committee's Notice in Form SVLDRS-3 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Scheme Provisions.
8 Feb 2022The Petitioner, Ashwini Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Purchaser of Tenanted Agricultural Land Against Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry. Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Purchaser Cannot Claim Rights Without Adjudication Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
30 Jul 2012The appellant, M/s. S. Kumar Developers and Builders, purchased agricultural land that was tenanted. The appellant obtained mutation entries in the re...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project in Colaba, Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Defence Authority's Letter. NOC from Defence Authorities Not Required for Completion of Construction Under DCR 1991 as Height Restriction Under Works of Defence Act, 1903 Not Applicable to Building Height Below 30 Meters.
27 Feb 2019The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment under the Development Control Regulations of 1991 ...
- 154
High Court
Development and Sale Agreement Constitutes Commercial Dispute Under Commercial Courts Act: Karnataka HC
19 Jan 2026The petitioner challenged the Trial Court’s rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC contending that the suit was a commercial...
- 373
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Incorporation of Arbitration Clause by Reference. Clause 14 of Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements Clearly Intended to Incorporate Entire Development Agreement Including Arbitration Clause.
13 May 2026The Supreme Court allowed appeals against a Bombay High Court order that had dismissed applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...
- 319
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Chartered Accountant in SFIO Complaint for Non-Compliance with Summons Under Companies Act, 1956. Complaint Filed Under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for Violation of Section 240(3) and Section 209A of Companies Act, 1956 Held Not Maintainable as SFIO Must File Complaint Under Section 240(4) of the Act.
19 May 2022The petitioner, Sanjay Sreesha, a Chartered Accountant, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking t...
- 141
